Reform: politically.

Prior to taking Politics for my A-levels, I was warned that it would make me a cynic; whilst I’d describe myself as being sceptical, I’m not really apathetic. Today is a year on from that referendum; rather than commenting on Brexit or Bremain, I wanted to analyse the actual mechanics of the Referendum-thereby suggesting possible reform.

Parliamentary Sovereignty.

Because of the concept of parliamentary sovereignty, Referendums aren’t common. We had: the common market vote (1975), AV for MP’s (2011), Scottish independence (which England couldn’t vote in), and Brexit (2016). Although not necessarily binding, we still have the First Past The Post system, giving a majority, and also a mandate because of it, to Parliament. The reform here needs to be less of a fragmented system-because the results will be disputed otherwise, because generally speaking, it’s only two percent either way.

Collective responsibility.

Basically: the cabinet is obliged to work with the PM in public on policy. Once inside the cabinet rooms, they can disagree, but once public, it’s generally advised to be in line with the PM. But for this referendum, it was suspended, which I found a bit odd: surely our leaders should be unbiased, and not promoting another agenda? I would like to see secret ballots instead, without the need for campaigning-and also because it got to be so misleading. (Voters don’t need lies! They need truth!)

The question needs to have the implication.

Generally speaking, we are all opinionated. And we vote on those opinions we hold dear-whether it’s pro big buisness, against unions, etc. But to have a simple yes/no balloted paper does not give the implication of what happens otherwise, lest the result swing the other way. Because of the way his position had been undermined, David Cameron resigned from being PM. With that is a leadership election, new cabinet-so much transition. And I feel as if this was not really understood at the time. We need possibly implications, and procedures in place.

The way voted for.

Ostensibly, this referendum may have been a protest vote-along the lines of “vote the other way, we’ll shake the establishment”. This is not good because if true, it is not truly representative. Politics is about you, the people-and we only have the chance to show what we want every once in a while. We shouldn’t be voting like this.

But a note about mandates.

The majority vote gives the government a mandate. Simple as.

Hate crime is still inexcusable.

On reading that hate crime had rocketed after the referendum, I was truly disgusted. Brexit was a vote about whether the UK wanted to stay in a political organisation-not about hate! (The rhetoric of some leaders was awful; this was a vote about an organisation. ) And surely EU citizens and immigrants still have every right to live here!? We need them. We’d be silly to think so otherwise.

If there is a oddity of reaction-what I’m calling this reaction-but I would still like this to be called out.



I am pleased to announce that I am working with Basic Beauty Tools. If you go to their website via this link , and order the Spongedry, you can get an extra free foundation blender by adding under ‘Note To Seller’ your colour code: LYDIAPINK for pink, LYDIAPURPLE for purple, and LYDIABLACK for black.

8 thoughts on “Reform: politically.

  1. Alice says:

    I think the problem with the EU Referendum was that most people don’t know enough about the EU to make an informed vote, and a lot of people were swung by lies told by campaigners. But you’re right, whatever the result of the vote, hate crimes are inexcusable.


    • Mademoiselle says:

      We don’t need lies! I was lucky to have taken Politics as a subject and researched it, but using something politically to legitimises cruelty made me feel sick; it was and still is a disgrace.


  2. Robyn says:

    I’m so glad you have written this post because as much as I try to understand all the terminology it can be hard to know it all! Hate crimes are just pure evil! I feel like a lot of us knew this would sadly be the outcome of Brexit and I really think we as a country should be doing more to protect the victims and punish those who carry it out!
    Robyn //


    • Mademoiselle says:

      I don’t really think Brexit was the cause; it was the amount of hate, bad feeling, etc that was seemingly brewed by the campaigns. I may be all for Brexit, but these crimes make me sick. Same as recently-we just need to be kind!


  3. Corinne & Kirsty 🌸 (@corinnekirsty) says:

    Being opinionated is one thing, not allowing others to have their own opinion is something else. I never understand how people can have such hateful speeches. I would never say something like that. But even though it does not excuse anything, there are other aspects to take into account that may help understand where it all comes from. But, yeah, totally agree with you; xx corinne


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s